Home arrow Trial Results arrow 2003 Trial Results arrow 2003 Corrigin Landmark Stripe Rust Management Options Trial
 
     
2003 Corrigin Landmark Stripe Rust Management Options Trial Print E-mail
Friday, 09 January 2004

Trial No: 03CO07SP

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in efficacy of in-furrow, seed dressing and foliar fungicides in managing stripe rust in the Corrigin area in Wyalkatchem wheat in 2003.
LOCATION: West Corrigin
AGRONOMIST: Sally Porter

RESULTS

     
Yield (T/Ha)
  Treatment   Tilt Opus Turret
1 Premis   3.29 3.27 3.31
2 Baytan   3.22 3.24 3.27
3 Real   3.20 3.28 3.23
4 Jockey   3.14 3.24 3.10
5 Turret   3.47 3.02 3.22
6 Imp. 200   3.28 3.31 3.15
7 Imp. 400   3.22 3.30 3.23
8 Imp. 200   3.24 3.43 3.16
9 Jockey   3.17 3.35 3.29
10 Baytan   3.15 3.20 3.17
11 Premis   3.19 3.17 3.08
12 Real   3.19 3.17 3.08
13 Imp. 400   3.28 3.26 3.16
14 Turret   3.19 3.18 3.08
15 Jockey   3.26 3.24 3.15
16 Imp. 200   3.34 3.32 3.22
17 Baytan   3.16 3.14 3.05
18 Imp. 400   3.18 3.16 3.07
19 Turret   3.17 3.16 3.06
20 Premis   3.09 3.07 2.98
21 Real   3.03 3.01 2.93
    LSD 0.01 0.15 0.15 0.15
    LSD 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.12
    Coefficient of Variation 2.29 2.29 2.29

Gross Margin Assumptions & Product Costs

Assumtions for gross margins were that there were fixed costs of $180 and then treatment costs were as follows:
Product $/ha
Premis @ 1L/ha 1.83
Baytan @ 1.5L/ha 3.45
Real @ 1.5L/ha 8.15
Triad IF@ 800ml/ha 6
Jockey @ 4.5L/ha 18.14
Imapact IF @ 200ml/ha 12.6
Impact IF @ 400ml/ha 21.6
Tilt @ 250ml/ha 12
Exp 1 (price in-line with current industry standard broad-spectrum foliar fungicides) 12
Turret @ 1L/ha 7
The price of wheat was adjusted according to screenings and protien and based oin the AWB golden Rewards Matrix from the 16th December 2003.
Note: Prices based on 70kg/Ha Seeding Rate

Table 1 Quality Sample results

    Premis Baytan Real Triad IF Imp. 200 Jockey Imp. 400
Tilt Protein 10.2 10.4 10 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.2
Screenings 2.14 2.71 2.56 2.53 2.34 2.19 2.08
  Hectolitre weight 82.02 81.62 82.62 82.12 82.28 82 81.48
Exp 1 Protein 9.8 9.9 10 10 10 10 10.1
Screenings 2.24 2.69 2.55 2.47 2.2 2.27 2.44
Hectolitre weight 81.98 82.36 82.04 81.62 81.66 81.78 81.64
Turret Protein 10 10.2 10 9.9 10.2 10 10.1
Screenings 2.84 3.17 2.91 3.04 2.12 2.52 2.86
  Hectolitre weight 82.28 81.24 81.76 81.4 81.92 81.52 80.94

Table 2 Gross Margins

  Tilt Exp 1 Turret
Premis 534.89 530.59 516.93
Baytan 522.54 530.21 524.18
Real 509.58 516.64 500.28
Triad IF 546.73 510.22 512.47
Jockey 518.58 537.98 513.33
Impact IF 200 546.70 561.37 526.22
Impact IF 400     523.16    522.78    504.26  


 

 TRIAL DETAILS

PSPE: TriflurX @ 1.5L/ha + Roundup Powermax @ 1L/ha
Water Volume: 50
Sown 26th May 2003 @ 70kg/Ha
Post
Soil Type: sandy loam
Seeding Method: knife points and press wheels
Fertiliser Vigour @ 120kg/ha + Urea (TD) @ 100kg/ha
Seeding Depth 20mm
   
   

Soil Test ppm

N P K S Mg Cu Zn Mo Mn
  55 154 56   0.5 0.7   3.7

Trial Discussion

While the aim of the trial was to assess Stripe Rust management options following the first official finding of Stripe Rust in WA in August 2002 there was no stripe rust present in the trial in 2003 and thus the comparisons in the trial are in the absence of rust but with low levels of Septoria nodorum and/or Yellow Spot.

Compared to the control (Premis) there was no significant difference in yields compared to the other treatments.

The site was Predicta-B tested and the only visual disease pressure present throughout the year was low levels of Septoria nodorum/Yellow Spot (visual assessment only, not tested).

The trend in the yields was for there to be no effect of the fungicide treatment compared to the control when a narrow-spectrum seed dressing (Baytan and Real) plus either a narrow- (Turret) or broad- (Tilt and Exp1) spectrum foliar fungicide was used. Similarly when a broad-spectrum seed dressing (Jockey) or in-furrow treatment (Triad IF, Impact @ 200ml/ha or Impact @ 400ml/ha) with a narrow-spectrum foliar fungicide (Turret) was used there was there was very little difference from the control. However, where a broad-spectrum seed dressing (Jockey) or in-furrow treatment (Triad IF, Impact @ 200ml/ha or Impact @ 400ml/ha) with a broad-spectrum foliar fungicide (Tilt or Exp 1) was used there was a trend to an increase in yield, presumably attributed to the suppression of the Septoria nodorum/Yellow Spot.

Impact @ 200ml/ha outyielded Impact @ 400ml/ha when used in conjunction with Tilt and Exp 1 foliar applied. The difference between the two rates of Impact seem to have been noted in other Landmark trials in WA in 2003 and may be due to the seed and the fertiliser going down the same tube and the Impact having a toxic affect on the seed. If this is the case it is not reflected in the plant counts taken at 6 WAS where there were slightly more plants per square metre in the Impact @ 400ml/ha plots (165 plants/m2) than in the Impact at 200ml/ha plots (162 plants/m2).

For all treatments protein was consistently around the 10% (9.8-10.4%) mark and screenings consistently low ranging between 2.12% to 3.17% (Table 1).

Summary

Where the disease spectrum includes diseases like Septoria nodorun and/or Yellow Spot a broad-spectrum seed dressing or in-furrow fungicide followed by a broad-spectrum foliar fungicide may result in a yield increase and give the best gross margins (Table 2). In a rust epidemic year these broad-spectrum control measures will help in the management of the rust however and increased number of strategically timed foliar fungicide applications may be necessary. To establish this more trials with similar protocols will need to be done when rust is prevalent. It would be pertinent to leave a completely untreated control and also have the seed dressings, in-furrow treatments and also the foliar treatments applied singularly as well as in combination as was done in the current trial.

 

 
< Prev   Next >
   
 
 
 
Copyright ©2005 Corrigin Farm Improvement Group Inc. -|- Contact us