| 2001 Wheat CVT Time of Sowing 2 |
|
|
| Sunday, 22 December 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CVT Trial results provided by Agritech.
Yield CV(%)= 7.7400 Notes on Grade & Income Calculation Yield An analysis of variance was conducted on yield results. A Least Significant Difference (LSD) was calculated with a confidence interval of 95% and displayed in the above table. In comparing two yields, the difference between them must be greater than the LSD for there to be a statistically significant difference. Grade Classification A sample of each variety was retained at harvest and analysed for protein, hectolitre weight and screenings. A grade was allocated based on the AWB varietal classification and the results of the quality analysis. Gross Income A price was calculated using the Estimated Silo Return to the nearest CBH delivery point. AWB Golden Rewards grade and quality payment scales were applied. These results assume the appropriate service is available at the nearest CBH. Estimated Pool Returns ($/t, FOB, GST Exclusive) as at 18th Dec 2001
Disclaimer: Agritech Crop Research has taken reasonable care in the preparation of this information and accepts no responsibility for inaccuracies. Trial results are for general informational purposes only. Do not make decisions based on these results alone. Always seek professional advise regarding varietal selection. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Next > |
|---|



